TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Re: any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier?
Subject
Re: any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier?
Posted by
StormShadow
on December 06, 2003 at 2:17 PM
This message has been viewed
24
times.
In Reply To
any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier?
posted by tranzlucent
on December 06, 2003 at 11:55 AM
Message
95 is probably the best, 94 is also pretty much the same. 96 Has the controversial 280HP issue, not sure how if thats the same with 96 n/a.
1995 AE model 300zxTT Stage 3@16PSI
Follow Ups
any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier?
-
tranzlucent
11:55:19 12/06/03
Yeah, you can't find them as readily as 90-93 :) (n/m)
-
Z Wang(Austin)
12:07:56 12/06/03
Official number of Z's produced 90 to 96 (Motortrend=source)
-
infamouseb (NYC)
14:16:33 12/06/03
I believe 95 Z are harder to mod.. due to smog law for 95+ (n/m)
-
SonicZ
12:40:54 12/06/03
95 is ok, the 96 has OBD II (n/m)
-
Technomancer
13:58:01 12/06/03
Check out the site FAQ, they have a list of what changed
-
kruZing
14:12:40 12/06/03
Re: any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier? -
StormShadow
14:17:55 12/06/03
Earlier models had better quality carpeting & sound dead-
-
YugoBernie (NoVA)
02:09:05 12/07/03
cool, thanks for the advice Bernie. (n/m)
-
tranzlucent
04:55:10 12/07/03
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.